Homeworks academic service


Should university students pay their own education

Please take this as an example only! This resource hasn't been reviewed.

Therefore, it might need lots of improvements. The reason this happened is we are implementing more features for this website.

  1. Therefore, you need to use it with caution.
  2. The distribution of benefits and the time delays in getting them make it impossible to accurately quantify who benefits from university education, by how much and when.
  3. The distribution of benefits and the time delays in getting them make it impossible to accurately quantify who benefits from university education, by how much and when. There is evidence that they are deterred from going to university and this affects social mobility NAO 2017.

Therefore, you need to use it with caution. Everything has two sides and the issue of whether the university fees should be paid by government or not is not an exception. There are some people who opine that government authorities should take responsibility for paying the university fees.

IELTS Practice

Others disagree and say that it is only the responsibility of students to pay for their higher studies. People who are in favour of free education argue that it is the duty of government to make education accessible to everyone. There are certain families who cannot afford to pay for the education of their children. Generally, university education expenditures are much higher compared to school level education. Therefore, it is not necessary that everyone can bear the burden of high expenditures of this education.

IELTS Writing Sample

It would also be unfair to reject a student's application who has performed well in his academic career just because he or she has no money to pay for the fees.

Moreover, talented young students are an important asset of any nation who if encouraged, can drive the economy of a country further and make a country prosper. On the other hand, opponents claim that university education should not be free to all.

They say that if students go for higher studies, it will only benefit them not the whole nation because they would earn for themselves and it is only they who would progress and improve standard of living.

  • People who are in favour of free education argue that it is the duty of government to make education accessible to everyone;
  • The distribution of benefits and the time delays in getting them make it impossible to accurately quantify who benefits from university education, by how much and when;
  • Do you like this?
  • The system as it has developed has significant problems;
  • Bolton P 2012 , Education;
  • Another reason that they mention to support their argument is that people pay high amount of taxes to support education systems and run.

Therefore, this budget should be diverted to other facilities for public such as healthcare, sports, arts and so on. Another reason that they mention to support their argument is that people pay high amount of taxes to support education systems and run.

  1. This is one of the reasons that the interest is so high currently 6. They say that if students go for higher studies, it will only benefit them not the whole nation because they would earn for themselves and it is only they who would progress and improve standard of living.
  2. When they are dissatisfied, they bog universities down with consumer legal actions.
  3. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? This would be a small increment on marginal tax rates for those with university degrees.
  4. Government borrows the money that it lends to students. New private, for-profit universities have been formed and many of these private providers as these new market entrants are called work in partnership with existing universities, offering subcontracted teaching programmes.
  5. The reason this happened is we are implementing more features for this website.

A lot of money is invested in research sector, which may fail many times. In this way this burden is placed on the shoulders of general public which should be avoided.

  • This financial reform allowed government to achieve a long-cherished aim of substantially privatising and marketising university education;
  • Students can take out government loans the government borrows the money itself to cover their tuition fees and living costs;
  • There can be long and unpredictable time delays between the period of education and when and where the benefits arise;
  • Through their teaching work, universities meet important individual, social, cultural and economic needs.

In conclusion, I think both situations have their own advantages and disadvantages but I do believe that only outstanding students should be provided funds to study and conduct research. Do you like this? To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?