Homeworks academic service


Systemic corporate and individual issues raised by the case

Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. What are the systemic, corporate, and individual issues raised in this case?

What are the systemic corporate and individual issues raised by enron

Not drilling in the mesa could be more costly for Americans than creating a plan that monitors wildlife sustainability during drilling in all seasons. In order to drill Questar would have to either halt production during winter months to avoid distressing migratory animals, or invest in new equipment. Halting production during winter months would be very costly. Questar would have to pack up all machinery and move every year.

Gas or Grouse Essay Sample

In the end it would take 18 years to reach full development of its oil fields. Developing new machinery would be very costly but it would half the amount of rigs needed to be set up. Creating a pipeline to expedite waste would reduce the human presence overall. Preserving wildlife over gas companies using cleaner natural gas with less impact on the environment. Many species could suffer from the increased noise and interference of human intervention in the Pinedale Mesa.

The increased human presence dangerously affects the Sage Grouse as well as other mammals to the point of not being able to recover, especially during the winter months. Concepts and Cases 7th Edition p 299 par 13.

  • They would have to have the same values and moral standards but obviously they have very different standpoints on the issue;
  • In order to drill Questar would have to either halt production during winter months to avoid distressing migratory animals, or invest in new equipment.

How should wildlife species like grouse or deer be valued, and how should that value be balanced against the economic interests of a society or of a company like Questar? What principles or rules would you propose we use to balance the value of wildlife species against economic interests?

Is the cost of losing a bird species worth the creation of more jobs and less foreign dependency?

Gas or Grouse Essay Sample

In light of the fact that natural gas reduces the U. If Questar had the same morals and ethics that the conservationist held, hey might stop drilling. They would have to have the same values and moral standards but obviously they have very different standpoints on the issue.

This shows a moral obligation towards the economy and their buyers. Questar might have also felt a moral obligation to drill because of the massive untapped goldmine of gas found under the sandstone in mesa, and the fact they had the resources to withdraw it. Concepts and Cases 7th Edition p 298 par 4. What, if anything, should Questar and the other companies be doing differently? Concepts and Cases 7th Edition p 299 par 14. From an ethical point of view, was alternative 4 the best option among those from which the BLM chose?

Is another alternative better from an ethical point of view? I like number 4 the most because it attended to both sides of the ethical issue.

Systemic corporate and individual issues raised by the case

Overall I agree with the fourth option because it went above and beyond just limiting drill pads to a certain number or certain area. It promised the yearly examination of the drilling effect on the wildlife and it drew a line to establish how much of an effect was too harsh on the animals.

Should the loss of species produced by the drilling operations of Questar be considered a problem of pollution or a problem of conservation? You could attribute the loss of species to both pollution and conservational issues. You have a large amount of human pollution when building these large rigs in the middle of the dense wildlife. Manmade structures, roads and such could be considered human pollution because it takes away from wildlife and natural resources. The problem with conservation is our willingness to have a part in it.

Not everyone is willing to accept that human interference is a problem with conservation, and some label people who value nature, as extremists.

It depends on what your moral standards are. We know that these are impartial and so is your position on if drilling is a problem with conservation. More essays like this: