Homeworks academic service


Haig the butcher of the somme essay

How to Write a Summary of an Article? Did General Haig deserve to be the Butcher of the Somme? It took place on either side of the River Somme in France, and it ended on 18 November 1916. The battle caused millions of deaths and injuries between both sides.

From a great adventure, to a bloody event.

Related History documents

General Douglas Haig was one of the commanders from the British army in the Battle of Somme, the battle with one of the highest casualties in British military history.

But does he deserve the title?

Does General Haig deserve the title Butcher of the Somme?

Or was he just doing his job and was there any misunderstanding in the battle? I will talk about the evidences and explain why many people view both sides and if he deserves the title or not. South bank of the German defense was made incapable of resisting another attack. They retreated to the north bank which abandonment of Fricourt was ordered. The German army went to the north bank and inflicted a huge defeat on the British infantry, which killed so many Britain soldiers.

  1. But no one cared to make a legend out of that.
  2. There was an obvious genius for pure generalship which has made Sir Douglas Haig fit to rank with any general of past or modern times. One argument goes that he was, ultimately, victorious and, even if he had been replaced would there have been anyone better for the job?
  3. It took place on either side of the River Somme in France, and it ended on 18 November 1916.
  4. But no one cared to make a legend out of that. The source supports the point that Douglas Haig is the Butcher of the battle of the Somme.
  5. Did General Haig deserve to be the Butcher of the Somme? Which made the people bitter and angry especially the anger from the men in the Front line, seeing Haig standing kilometers behind them, thinking that he was being a coward, and the ones who lost their family and relatives on the 1st of July?

A lot of people called Douglas Haig the Butcher of the Somme. Here are some pieces of evidence to support this point of view. It also tells us that General Haig received a large amount of money and an Earl given by the loyal afterward. This source was written years after the war in a local newspaper called Pro Venanic.

It can be trusted because it was written by a person who was in the battle who experienced what the war was like and what Haig was doing. Although the Germans had lost 680,000 men during the war and had retreated 10 kilometers back from their trenches. They human cost of the Britain and French were also very high. Especially on the first day of the battle, which lost a massive number of casualties in the war history?

Read a teacher's detailed analysis

Which made the people bitter and angry especially the anger from the men in the Front line, seeing Haig standing kilometers behind them, thinking that he was being a coward, and the ones who lost their family and relatives on the 1st of July?

Smith was also a private in the 1st Border regiment fighting on the Somme. He was one of them who called Haig a Butcher. Douglas Haig should have been hung, drawn and quartered for what he did on the Somme. The cream of the British manhood was shattered in less than six hours. He wrote this on July 1916, which was the first month of the battle of the Somme.

Given that over 50 thousands soldiers died on the first day, Haig as the leader of the team, P. The source supports the point that Douglas Haig is the Butcher of the battle of the Somme.

Haig butcher of the Somme?

He was not endowed with any of the elements of imagination and vision… And he certainly had none of that personal magnetism which has enabled great leaders of men to inspire multitudes with courage, faith and a spirit of sacrifice… He was incapable of planning vast campaigns on the scale demanded on so immense a battlefield.

This source is reliable because given the fact that it was written by a Prime Minister of Britain during WW1. There are three essential differences: Now turning to the Regimental Sergeant- Major what is the second difference? This source is very useful for us knowing more about General Haig at the time, in the cartoon, the major general is addressing the men before an attack behind the lines. This is also reliable, because it was written in 1917, which was after the battle of the Somme.

And it gives out information about Haig and his team. There can never be forgiven. So this source can be either reliable or not and it might not be so fair to Haig saying that he is a butcher. Haig the butcher of the somme essay the other hand, the second interpretation is that Haig was just doing his job as a general.

Haig, Butcher of the Somme

Different people have their different evidences for that. But no one cared to make a legend out of that. This might be supporting the point that he was just doing his job and he made a great success in the war. There was an obvious genius for pure generalship which has made Sir Douglas Haig fit to rank with any general of past or modern times. The writer says that Haig led his team and Britain to victory and he is the hero of us.

This source is also reliable because it was written in December 1916, right after the war ended. Here is a photograph showing crowds welcoming Sir Haig home from France. It was taken on 12th April 1919, a few months after the war ended. They treated him as a hero of Britain who led his army to victory and saved Britain.

However, this might not be such reliable as the other evidences.

  • Smith was also a private in the 1st Border regiment fighting on the Somme;
  • Different people have their different evidences for that;
  • There might be some other things happened in the past or later;
  • Although it was General Douglas Haig, who sent them to their death, there might be some misunderstanding in between;
  • Although the Germans had lost 680,000 men during the war and had retreated 10 kilometers back from their trenches.

A photograph cannot represent the whole thing. And the photo might not be real, or it was just created by the government to raise the support to Haig. A video is more reliable then a photo because we can see the start to the end. A photo is just a capture of one single moment. There might be some other things happened in the past or later. Haig was the product of his time, of his upbringing, education, and training and previous military experience.

One argument goes that he was, ultimately, victorious and, even if he had been replaced would there have been anyone better for the job?

  • This might be supporting the point that he was just doing his job and he made a great success in the war;
  • There are three essential differences;
  • It can be trusted because it was written by a person who was in the battle who experienced what the war was like and what Haig was doing;
  • This source is very useful for us knowing more about General Haig at the time, in the cartoon, the major general is addressing the men before an attack behind the lines.

The magazine was published in 1998, many years after the Battle of Somme. He tried his best and put a lot of effort on the planning and war, so that Britain had its victory at last. This source was written in 1998. Although the author might not be seeing the war time, it is reliable and it can be trusted that Haig was doing a great job during the war. There are more and more evidences to support both sides of opinion.

  1. The source supports the point that Douglas Haig is the Butcher of the battle of the Somme.
  2. Haig refused requests for extra hospital trains to be made available before the attack beg.
  3. However, this might not be such reliable as the other evidences.
  4. The magazine was published in 1998, many years after the Battle of Somme. The cream of the British manhood was shattered in less than six hours.
  5. On the other hand, the second interpretation is that Haig was just doing his job as a general.

He sent 50,000 Britain to death just for one day. He really believed that he won the battle, but in fact he did not. The Germans lost 680,000 men in the war, but at the same time, the deaths of Britain and French in total had the same amount of people died of the German empire. Haig refused requests for extra hospital trains to be made available before the attack beg.

His outdated tactics led to the war being even more prolonged and unintentionally prevented a victory over the Germans. He had no idea what a real war is.

He thought he was successful, but he was not. July 1 was one of the most deaths in war in the war haig the butcher of the somme essay. He repeated the mistakes opposite of what was said organized.

He is the Butcher of the Somme, I think. Overall, there is still a debate between he is a butcher or he was just doing his job. No matter which side wins, there were still a large number of people died in the Battle of the Somme.

A lot of people lost their homes, and lost their family. Although it was General Douglas Haig, who sent them to their death, there might be some misunderstanding in between.