Homeworks academic service


Persuasive essay on dropping the atomic bomb

Who wants to write essay for me? Some of these reasons would fall under the category of ethics and morality, politics, and humanity. The first argument that could be drawn to oppose the decision of the US regarding its bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki concerns ethics or morality.

America Should Not Have Dropped the Bombs

One of the reasons being cited to answer why US deserted to atomic bombing is the ethics or morality of the Japanese. It caused the death of millions of American soldiers. The attack is said to be the main reason why US wanted to take revenge on Japan, targeting to gain the full surrender of the country. The bombing of the Pearl Harbor by the Japanese was said to be unethical. In fact, the act was considered as a kind of terrorist attack. Let us just imagine that the Japanese way of killing, not only during the Pearl Harbor attack, but attacks to other countries as well, was really not acceptable.

There were reports of cases of treacherous killings among the captives of the Japanese. One example of this was the case of the Bataan Death March. American and Filipino captives in the Philippines did the march that lasted for over sixty miles.

  1. Westview Press, 1998 Wainstock, Dennis D.
  2. The bombs killed not only innocent people.
  3. The bombs also disintegrated all the dreams and wishes of these innocent lives.

The captives, who lacked medication, were forced to march from Manila to Bataan. Some of those captives were shot in the head when they had stopped from marching.

  • For example, you used sources to show how new inventions improved the lives of people in Britain in the 19 th century;
  • Since the end of World War II, governments have in fact used combinations of all other types of persuasion, but have avoided using nuclear bombs;
  • Nuclear bombs are known as one of the most harmful radioactive toxins;
  • Was the dropping of the atomic bomb necessary to end the World War?
  • Let us just imagine that the Japanese way of killing, not only during the Pearl Harbor attack, but attacks to other countries as well, was really not acceptable.

In addition to this, the Japanese were known by their way of killing captives. They slashed the throats of their captives or burned their bodies on fire. These brutalities were considered inhumane by some, thus making the nuclear bombing a justifiable act.

However, no matter how inhumane the Japanese behaved and treated their captives, it is not an enough reason to give them back the same treatment. The decision of President Truman regarding the dropping of the bombs was simply inhumane as well. If we, the Americans, would do the same actions as those of the Japanese, then what is our difference from them?

In addition to this, the damage that had been brought by the two nuclear bombs was far incomparable with that brought by the attacks of the Japanese. The attack killed 2, 000 soldiers and over 50 civilians.

If this number would be compared with the total number of people who died during the nuclear bombings, then it would only just a small percentage. In addition to this, the Pearl Harbor attack was mainly focused on the US armed forces.

Writing An Argumentative Essay The United States’ Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb.

The Hiroshima and the Nagasaki attacks, on the other hand, were not only directed towards the Japanese army. The bombings actually blew two cities into complete ashes. There seems to be a problem with the reversed attack done by the United States.

World War II/Atomic Bomb: Was it necessary term paper 1522

Aside from the issue of ethics, political power was also being considered as one of the factors that affect the dropping of the nuclear bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. If deeply analyzed, Truman just used the situation to show to other countries and political leaders, particularly to Stalin of Germany, that the US was a powerful country that is prepared enough for any kind of battle.

In fact, it seems that the dropping of the bomb was originally intended only for Hiroshima. But because the US government wanted to elude the suspicions of other countries regarding its political strength, Truman launched another bomb intended for Nagasaki.

He did not want other countries to think that the US government only possessed one nuclear bomb. The bombing could also be pointed out as the logic behind the occurrence of Cold War.

Finally, the US should not have dropped the nuclear bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki because of its great impact to the humanity.

  1. Nuclear bombs are known as one of the most harmful radioactive toxins. Argumentative Essay 5 Argumentative vs.
  2. In addition to this, the Pearl Harbor attack was mainly focused on the US armed forces.
  3. The full source citation will appear on your Works Cited page. Japan's plan to piece together remaining forces against the predicted U.
  4. Writer uses evidence from credible sources to inform the reader. Stanford, 2003 Sodei, Rinjiro.
  5. Start your paper early and rewrite it several times. We need to ask no favors of the them.

Nuclear bombs are known as one of the most harmful radioactive toxins. The bombing, although served as an offense and defense of America, was still a crime against the humanity.

The bombs killed not only innocent people. The bombs also disintegrated all the dreams and wishes of these innocent lives.

Not quite the topic you need?

The effect of the bomb attacks in Hiroshima and Nagasaki lasted not only during that decade of war. The effects of the bombing will continue to take effect for eternity. Works Cited Sherwin, Martin J.

Hiroshima and its Legacies, 2nd edition. Stanford, 2003 Sodei, Rinjiro. Were We the Enemy?: American Survivors of Hiroshima. Westview Press, 1998 Wainstock, Dennis D. The Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb.