Homeworks academic service


A comparison of the similarities and differences in benefits for employees between federal agencies

Some politicians and an association of federal employees have criticized Trump for this action, saying that federal workers are underpaid and deserve a raise.

However, a broad range of studies have found that most federal civilian employees are paid better than comparable workers in the private sector.

Federal employee pay, benefits ahead of private sector on average, CBO concludes

The law gives added raises to federal workers in certain localities if their compensation is lower than private-sector workers in those areas. The law also allows the president of the U.

We must maintain efforts to put our nation on a fiscally sustainable course, and federal agency budgets cannot sustain such increases. These alternative pay plan decisions will not materially affect our ability to attract and retain a well qualified federal workforce.

A Look at Pay for Federal Employees Compared to Their Private-Sector Counterparts

It accounted for education, occupation, work experience, geographic location, employer size, and various demographic characteristics. The study found that: Federal workers received an average of 17 percent more total compensation than comparable private sector workers. Across various education levels, federal employee compensation premiums ranged from a low of —18 percent for workers with a professional degree or doctorate to a high of 53 percent for workers with a high school diploma or less: Per the Congressional Budget Office: A 2010 study by the U.

Bureau of Labor Statistics found that full-time private industry workers worked an average of 12 percent more hours per year than full-time state and local government workers.

25 Differences Between Private Sector and Government Managers

This includes time spent working beyond assigned schedules at the workplace and at home. In keeping with such realities and the principle of rewarding people for the quality and quantity of their work, Trump also wrote: Federal employee pay must be performance-based, and aligned strategically toward recruiting, retaining, and rewarding high-performing federal employees and those with critical skill sets.

Across-the-board pay increases and locality pay increases, in particular, have long-term fixed costs, yet fail to address existing pay disparities or target mission critical recruitment and retention goals. Other Analyses In 2012, the U.

  • Per the Congressional Budget Office;
  • Other Analyses In 2012, the U.

Excluding that, the federal premiums from the various studies were 16 percent, 20 percent, 30—40 percent, and 61 percent. It was formally published a year later in the journal Public Administration Research.

The Government Accountability Office identified two defining features of this study: The 2017 CBO study found that such benefits account for more than 80 percent of the compensation differential between federal and private workers. As explained by Ph.

  • Federal employee pay must be performance-based, and aligned strategically toward recruiting, retaining, and rewarding high-performing federal employees and those with critical skill sets;
  • In keeping with such realities and the principle of rewarding people for the quality and quantity of their work, Trump also wrote:

Thus, the study is effectively useless for comparing the total compensation of comparable employees. Contrastingly, the Princeton study and all of the studies examined by the Government Accountability Office that take these factors into account found that federal employees enjoy a significant advantage in compensation.