Homeworks academic service


A life and work of nicholas copernicus

His father, Nicolaus, was a well-to-do merchant, and his mother, Barbara Watzenrode, also came from a leading merchant family. Nicolaus was the youngest of four children.

Nicolaus Copernicus Biography: Facts & Discoveries

Like many students of his time, however, he left before completing his degree, resuming his studies in Italy at the University of Bolognawhere his uncle had obtained a doctorate in canon law in 1473. The Bologna period 1496—1500 was short but significant.

  1. Nature quotes the AFP as stating that the reconstruction "bore a striking resemblance to portraits of the young Copernicus.
  2. Learn More in these related Britannica articles.
  3. Courtesy of the Newberry Library, Chicago A second tradition, deriving from Claudius Ptolemy , solved this problem by postulating three mechanisms.

For a time Copernicus lived in the same house as the principal astronomer at the university, Domenico Maria de Novara Latin: A life and work of nicholas copernicus Maria Novaria Ferrariensis; 1454—1504.

Novara had the responsibility of issuing annual astrological prognostications for the city, forecasts that included all social groups but gave special attention to the fate of the Italian princes and their enemies. Novara also probably introduced Copernicus to two important books that framed his future problematic as a student of the heavens: The first such known observation occurred on March 9, 1497, at Bologna.

By the time he published this observation in 1543, he had made it the basis of a theoretical claim: In 1500 Copernicus spoke before an interested audience in Rome on mathematical subjects, but the exact content of his lectures is unknown. In 1501 he stayed briefly in Frauenburg but soon returned to Italy to continue his studies, this time at the University of Paduawhere he pursued medical studies between 1501 and 1503.

Copernicus later painted a self-portrait; it is likely that he acquired the necessary artistic skills while in Paduasince there was a flourishing community of painters there and in nearby Venice. In May 1503 Copernicus finally received a doctorate—like his uncle, in canon law—but from an Italian university where he had not studied: When he returned to Poland, Bishop Watzenrode arranged a sinecure for him: As a church canon, he collected rents from church-owned lands; secured military defenses; oversaw chapter finances; managed the bakery, brewery, and mills; and cared for the medical needs of the other canons and his uncle.

He used the knowledge of Greek that he had acquired during his A life and work of nicholas copernicus studies to prepare a Latin translation of the aphorisms of an obscure 7th-century Byzantine historian and poet, Theophylactus Simocattes. The work was published in Cracow in 1509 and dedicated to his uncle.

The civil calendar then in use was still the one produced under the reign of Julius Caesarand, over the centuries, it had fallen seriously out of alignment with the actual positions of the Sun.

This rendered the dates of crucial feast days, such as Easterhighly problematic. The leading calendar reformer was Paul of Middelburg, bishop of Fossombrone. At this time the terms astrologer, astronomer, and mathematician were virtually interchangeable; they generally denoted anyone who studied the heavens using mathematical techniques. Pico claimed that astrology ought to be condemned because its practitioners were in disagreement about everything, from the divisions of the zodiac to the minutest observations to the order of the planets.

A second long-standing disagreement, not mentioned by Pico, concerned the status of the planetary models.

User Contributions:

From antiquity, astronomical modeling was governed by the premise that the planets move with uniform angular motion on fixed radii at a constant distance from their centres of motion. Two types of models derived from this premise. The first, represented by that of Aristotleheld that the planets are carried around the centre of the universe embedded in unchangeable, material, invisible spheres at fixed distances. Since all planets have the same centre of motion, the universe is made of nested, concentric spheres with no gaps between them.

As a predictive model, this account was of limited value. Among other things, it had the distinct disadvantage that it could not account for variations in the apparent brightness of the planets since the distances from the centre were always the same.

Aristotle's theory of the solar system.

Nicolaus Copernicus: An Essay On His Life And Work

Courtesy of the Newberry Library, Chicago A second tradition, deriving from Claudius Ptolemysolved this problem by postulating three mechanisms: The equant, however, broke with the main assumption of ancient astronomy because it separated the condition of uniform motion from that of constant distance from the centre.

A planet viewed from the centre c of its orbit would appear to move sometimes faster, sometimes slower. As seen from Earth, removed a distance e from c, the planet would also appear to move nonuniformly. Only from the equant, an imaginary point at distance 2e from Earth, would the planet appear to move uniformly.

  1. The Ptolemaic system would have proved sterile because progress would have proven too difficult. Remains thought to be his were discovered in 2005.
  2. Copernicus never took orders as a priest, but instead continued to work as a secretary and physician for his uncle in Warmia. Copernicus might have continued this work by considering each planet independently, as did Ptolemy in the Almagest, without any attempt to bring all the models together into a coordinated arrangement.
  3. The system is outlined in a short manuscript known as the Commentariolus, or small commentary, which he completed about 1512. At this time the terms astrologer, astronomer, and mathematician were virtually interchangeable; they generally denoted anyone who studied the heavens using mathematical techniques.

A planet-bearing sphere revolving around an equant point will wobble; situate one sphere within another, and the two will collide, disrupting the heavenly order. Ptolemy's theory of the solar system.

See a Problem?

This insight was the starting point for his attempt to resolve the conflict raised by wobbling physical spheres. Copernicus might a life and work of nicholas copernicus continued this work by considering each planet independently, as did Ptolemy in the Almagest, without any attempt to bring all the models together into a coordinated arrangement.

The difficulty focused on the locations of Venus and Mercury. There was general agreement that the Moon and Sun encircled the motionless Earth and that MarsJupiterand Saturn were situated beyond the Sun in that order. In the Commentariolus, Copernicus postulated that, if the Sun is assumed to be at rest and if Earth is assumed to be in motion, then the remaining planets fall into an orderly relationship whereby their sidereal periods increase from the Sun as follows: Mercury 88 daysVenus 225 daysEarth 1 yearMars 1.

This theory did resolve the disagreement about the ordering of the planets but, in turn, raised new problems.

It was also necessary to explain how a transient body like Earth, filled with meteorological phenomena, pestilence, and wars, could be part of a perfect and imperishable heaven. In addition, Copernicus was working with many observations that he had inherited from antiquity and whose trustworthiness he could not verify.

In constructing a theory for the precession of the equinoxes, for example, he was trying to build a model based upon very small, long-term effects. And his theory for Mercury was left with serious incoherencies.

Nicolaus Copernicus Biography

He remarked in the preface to De revolutionibus that he had chosen to withhold publication not for merely the nine years recommended by the Roman poet Horace but for 36 years, four times that period.

Rheticus, a Lutheran from the University of Wittenberg, Germany, stayed with Copernicus at Frauenburg for about two and a half years, between 1539 and 1542. It provided a summary of the theoretical principles contained in the manuscript of De revolutionibus, emphasized their value for computing new planetary tables, and presented Copernicus as following admiringly in the footsteps of Ptolemy even as he broke fundamentally with his ancient predecessor.

It also provided what was missing from the Commentariolus: Both Rheticus and Copernicus knew that they could not definitively rule out all possible alternatives to the heliocentric theory.

Rheticus compared this new universe to a well-tuned musical instrument and to the interlocking wheel-mechanisms of a clock. The theories of his predecessors, he wrote, were like a human figure in which the arms, legs, and head were put together in the form of a disorderly monster.

Nicolaus Copernicus

His own representation of the universe, in contrast, was an orderly whole in which a displacement of any part would result in a disruption of the whole. In effect, a new criterion of scientific adequacy was advanced together with the new theory of the universe.

He chose the top printer in the city, Johann Petreius, who had published a number of ancient and modern astrological works during the 1530s. However, Rheticus was unable to remain and supervise. He turned the manuscript over to Andreas Osiander 1498—1552a theologian experienced in shepherding mathematical books through production as well as a leading political figure in the city and an ardent follower of Luther although he was eventually expelled from the Lutheran church.

In earlier communication with Copernicus, Osiander had urged him to present his ideas as purely hypotheticaland he now introduced certain changes without the permission of either Rheticus or Copernicus. Both Petreius and Rheticus, having trusted Osiander, now found themselves double-crossed. He awoke long enough to realize that he was holding his great book and then expired, publishing as he perished. Learn More in these related Britannica articles: