Homeworks academic service


Did the defendant get a fair trial in 12 angry men

Because of the discussion and the focus on reasonable doubt, they do overcome their prejudice — they do set aside their bigoted views. Some are flippant and casual; many play tic tac toe. Many do not fulfil their legal duties. Socio-economic factors and social stereotyping: Many of the jury members discriminate against the boy because of his poor family background. They arrive at hasty conclusions and are quick to believe unreliable evidence.

He lacks supervision from his father who is an alcoholic, a gambler and an ex-prisoner. For this reason, they fail to question or investigate the evidence thoroughly. The 3rd juror resents the young boy because he reminds him of his own son.

  • They want a quick verdict;
  • Indeed, group dynamics, with a range of volatile and sensitive personalities do have an impact on the discussion.

Save us a lot of time and money. For example, the old man wants to be recognised and lives a lonely life. It becomes clear that he could not have quickly hurried to the door to see the young boy disappearing from his flat. Likewise, the woman wants to appear presentable in the jury stand, and so removes her glasses.

Factors that inhibit a fair trial 12 Angry Men

It also becomes evident that she could not have put on eyeglasses in time to see the boy. She could not have seen the boy up to 60 feet away.

Also the defence lawyer does not do a decent job and the prosecution team is well spoken articulate. The jurors are more likely to believe the prosecution team. Personal experience, background of jury members The personal experiences of many of the jury members influence their attitude to the boy and to the trial.

For example, the 3rd juror has an estranged relationship with his son and he has not seen him for 2 years p. It is not surprising that his tough approach to law and order stems from his own problematic relationship with his son. The 3rd juror is very aggressive and harsh and seeks to threaten the other jurors.

  • It is not surprising that his tough approach to law and order stems from his own problematic relationship with his son;
  • Indeed, group dynamics, with a range of volatile and sensitive personalities do have an impact on the discussion;
  • It is not surprising that his tough approach to law and order stems from his own problematic relationship with his son;
  • In addition, Juror No.

Ironically, Rose depersonalises the jury members with numbers to reinforce the fact that their personal interests should not intervene. They want a quick verdict. In addition, Juror No. Indeed, group dynamics, with a range of volatile and sensitive personalities do have an impact on the discussion.

Twelve Angry Men Essay

Contrastingly, the 8th juror is more patient, and is able to withstand scorn. He can be provocative to reinforce the flaws in the evidence.

  • The jurors are more likely to believe the prosecution team;
  • Personal experience, background of jury members The personal experiences of many of the jury members influence their attitude to the boy and to the trial.

However, he earns respect through his considerate and sensitive outlook, but also through his dramatic and colourful personality when he re-enacts some of the evidence so that others can literally visualise it.

The catalyst of change… Assumptions: I was very impressed.