Homeworks academic service

Pro death penalty arguments for research paper

Pro and Con The Death Penalty: Pro and Con Introduction Officially, thousands of people are sentenced to death every year in countries where the death penalty is practiced.

  • Thirteen states do not have the death penalty;
  • Bible Quotes Huggo A;
  • Today, the tide of public opinion is increasingly against the idea that capital punishment is aligned with the principles of the United States.

Given the prevalence of the death penalty in the modern world, it is fair to assume that there are perhaps justifications for it, though there are plenty of people who categorically oppose it. Without going into the details of any given judicial system, there are number of reasons to support both sides of the argument.

Cite This Resource:

Pro There are a number of practical arguments made for the death penalty. Because the death penalty is such a powerful construct, many argue that it decreases crime rates through deterrence.

Criminals rarely think about the consequences of their actions and this is especially true with crimes of passion. By killing felons, the death penalty removes the burden of housing them within the penitentiary system. Prison overcrowding and overstretched resources are key issues in prisons in many countries.

Death Penalty Essay

And if they were paroled, there is always the chance they could re-offend, which is completely eliminated with the death penalty. The concept of retribution, that the perpetrator is punished in a manner fitting to the crime, is also used to support the death penalty. Con There are many arguments against the death penalty that are both practical and ethical.

  • There has been increasing attention drawn to notable cases of individuals who were exonerated after languishing for years on death row;
  • There are no words that can explain the loss of your loved one to murder;
  • The study also reviewed 14 nations who abolished the death penalty.

It is very difficult to know the exact moral status of the death penalty, though many see it to be a degrading, barbaric, and amoral. The opponents of the death penalty argue that it causes incredible suffering and pain for the sentenced and brutalizes society as a whole where it operates. Both of these factors could have negative effects on crime and criminality.

The vast majority of people would at least argue that human life is highly valuable and should be preserved, though the extent at which preservation should make-way for retribution is where things become very debatable. Misconduct in institutional systems can also lead to incorrect sentencing.

  • Therefore, the case against the death penalty is much stronger than the case for it;
  • Those opposed to the death penalty say that it is immoral for the government to take the life of a citizen under any circumstance;
  • Yet while this temporarily required states to review how their death penalty statutes were written, it merely prolonged rather than terminated the use of the death penalty in the United States, as states reviewed how death penalty cases and sentencing were administrated;
  • When someone commits a crime it disturbs the order of society; these crimes take away lives, peace, and liberties from society;
  • According to Time Magazine, there are 2,000,000 people beaten in the United States.

While this is bad enough for non-death sentencing, these constitute a heinous breach of justice if the death penalty is involved. A psychological argument that may become prominent in the future is the concept of self-control and free will. Do we have free will or not?

Death Penalty Persuasive Essay

If not, this could bring into question not just the death penalty but all forms of sentencing whether it is capital punishment or not. New neurological research can now predict the likelihood of someone becoming violent and may help with future awareness on these issues.

More importantly, there appears to be a general reduction in the number of death sentences even in the countries continuing to uphold the death penalty. Conclusion It is arguable that countries still using the death penalty do so purely in response to criminality and try to deter future criminals with it.

The Death Penalty: Pro and Con

Ironically, many of the countries that have the death penalty suffer from higher crime rates. The death penalty does not cause the problem but it is merely a response to it.

  1. Life to me is scared as Professor Haag stated. They argue that it is important for the United States to take a stand for its own moral values.
  2. Works Cited Bosner, Kevin.
  3. The study also reviewed 14 nations who abolished the death penalty.

And while the death penalty is usually implemented by autocracy or religious doctrine, it is almost never used in response to actual modern societal values. Therefore, the case against the death penalty is much stronger than the case for it. This would be the same for anyone who believes that ethics are more important than any of the possible practical benefits.