Homeworks academic service

Thesis of guns germs and steel by jared diamond

His piece ties in strongly with many of the works and themes we have been discussing in class, which I will attempt to address in the course of the review.

This goes as follows: As a research question, this is incredibly broad, and links back strongly to the debate raised when reading Prasenjit Duara [4] and William J. According to Diamond, the answer is 11,000BC.

This in itself raises some methodological problems, and in turn led me back to an article and book excerpt about historical research and the use of archives. A pertinent point raised by Roy Rosenzweig [6] and John Randolph [7] was that of the problem of incomplete knowledge, and the limitations this posed when trying to investigate the past. This in itself is enough grounds to refute his model, both from a scientific perspective, or otherwise.

The book follows this thesis through to the end, with various examples for all world continents.

What is Diamond's thesis in Guns, Germs, and Steel?

Throughout the book, Diamond fails to answer why people chose to use their technology and resources in the way that they did. Although Diamond does explain early formative differences in pre-historic times [15]he uses a small variety of sources, and he does not leave enough space for the role of human agency as world history unfolds.

For example, when discussing the Spanish conquest of South America, causation is explained as follows: Attributing just one cause, without even considering or mentioning other contingent factors, presents an unsustainable and un-rigorous claim.

Diamond fails on both fronts.

  1. The American Historical Review.
  2. When I set out on the journey of Guns, Germs and Steel, what I was hoping to achieve was an understanding of the grand pattern of history and what I was expecting to show was, that I didn't know. Several conditions are necessary for this transition to occur.
  3. What do you say to that?
  4. This in itself is enough grounds to refute his model, both from a scientific perspective, or otherwise.
  5. Intellectual background[ edit ] In the 1930s, the Annales School in France undertook the study of long-term historical structures by using a synthesis of geography, history, and sociology. Farming arose early in the Fertile Crescent since the area had an abundance of wild wheat and pulse species that were nutritious and easy to domesticate.

First and foremost, Diamond addresses where his knowledge is lacking, as well as his academic background. It adds a lot to the debate about whether it is possible for causality to be taken back to the beginning of human life on earth. It must be noted that the book is well written and accessible, and raises a number of interesting points about the influence of geography and science on historical events.

What is Jared Diamond's thesis in Guns, Germs, and Steel and what question is he trying to answer?

Guns, germs, and steel: The American Historical Review. A forest of time: American Indian ways of history. The 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. The cheese and the worms: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Published by Laura Madokoro on March 20, 2014 at 8: Leave a Reply Your email address will not be published.